31 May 08
Posted in Arrhythmia, Cardiac arrest/Resuscitation at 16:26 by Laci
By M Haïssaguerre, N Derval, F Sacher, L Jesel, I Deisenhofer, L de Roy, J-L Pasquié, A Nogami et al
N Engl J Med 2008;358:2016-2023
Early repolarization is a common electrocardiographic finding that is generally considered to be benign. Its potential to cause cardiac arrhythmias has been hypothesized from experimental studies, but it is not known whether there is a clinical association with sudden cardiac arrest.
Method
We reviewed data from 206 case subjects at 22 centers who were resuscitated after cardiac arrest due to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and assessed the prevalence of electrocardiographic early repolarization. The latter was defined as an elevation of the QRS–ST junction of at least 0.1 mV from baseline in the inferior or lateral lead, manifested as QRS slurring or notching. The control group comprised 412 subjects without heart disease who were matched for age, sex, race, and level of physical activity. Follow-up data that included the results of monitoring with an implantable defibrillator were obtained for all case subjects.
Result
Early repolarization was more frequent in case subjects with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation than in control subjects (31% vs. 5%, P<0.001). Among case subjects, those with early repolarization were more likely to be male and to have a history of syncope or sudden cardiac arrest during sleep than those without early repolarization. In eight subjects, the origin of ectopy that initiated ventricular arrhythmias was mapped to sites concordant with the localization of repolarization abnormalities. During a mean (±SD) follow-up of 61±50 months, defibrillator monitoring showed a higher incidence of recurrent ventricular fibrillation in case subjects with a repolarization abnormality than in those without such an abnormality (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.5; P=0.008).
Conclusions
Among patients with a history of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, there is an increased prevalence of early repolarization.
Permalink
15 Apr 06
Posted in Anesthesia, Arrhythmia, Pre-operatie evaluation at 17:37 by Laci
By A Gauss, C Hubner, P Radermacher, M Georgieff, W Schutz
Anesthesiology 1998,88:679-687
Background
The incidence of perioperative bradyarrhythmias in patients with bifascicular or left bundle branch block (LBBB) and the influence of an additional first-degree atrioventricular (A-V) block has not been evaluated with 24-h Holter electrocardiographic monitoring. Therefore the authors assessed the rate of block progression and bradyarrhythmia in these patients.
Methods
Patients (n = 106) with asymptomatic bifascicular block or LBBB with or without an additional first-degree A-V block scheduled for surgery under general or regional anesthesia were enrolled prospectively. Three patients were excluded. Of the 103 remaining, 56 had a normal P-R interval and 47 had a prolonged one. Holter monitoring (CM2, CM5) was applied to each patient just before induction of anesthesia and was performed for 24 h. The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of block progression. As secondary endpoints, bradycardias < 40 beats/min with hemodynamic compromise (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) or asystoles > 5 s were defined.
Results
Block progression to second-degree A-V block and consecutive cardiac arrest occurred in one case of LBBB without a prolonged P-R interval. Severe bradyarrhythmias with hypotension developed in another eight patients: asystoles > 5 s occurred in two cases and six patients had bradycardias < 40/min. Pharmacotherapy was successful in these eight patients. There was no significant difference for severe bradyarrhythmias associated with hemodynamic compromise between patients with and without P-R prolongation (P = 1.00).
Conclusions
In patients with chronic bifascicular block or LBBB, perioperative progression to complete heart block is rare. However, the rate of bradyarrhythmias with hemodynamic compromise proved to be relevant. Because an additional first-degree A-V block did not increase the incidence of severe bradyarrhythmias and pharmacotherapy by itself was successful in nearly all cases, routine prophylactic insertion of a temporary pacemaker in such patients should be questioned.
Permalink