06 Jan 12
Posted in Fluid management at 4:58 by Laci
By B Guidet, N Soni, G D Rocca, S Kozek, B Vallet, D Annane and M James
Critical Care 2010;14:325
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://ccforum.com/content/14/5/325
The present review of fluid therapy studies using balanced solutions versus isotonic saline fluids (both crystalloids and colloids) aims to address recent controversy in this topic. The change to the acid-base equilibrium based on fluid selection is described. Key terms such as dilutional-hyperchloraemic acidosis (correctly used instead of dilutional acidosis or hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis to account for both the Henderson-Hasselbalch and Stewart equations), isotonic saline and balanced solutions are defined. The review concludes that dilutional-hyperchloraemic acidosis is a side effect, mainly observed after the administration of large volumes of isotonic saline as a crystalloid. Its effect is moderate and relatively transient, and is minimised by limiting crystalloid administration through the use of colloids (in any carrier). Convincing evidence for clinically relevant adverse effects of dilutional-hyperchloraemic acidosis on renal function, coagulation, blood loss, the need for transfusion, gastrointestinal function or mortality cannot be found. In view of the long-term use of isotonic saline either as a crystalloid or as a colloid carrier, the paucity of data documenting detrimental effects of dilutional-hyperchloraemic acidosis and the limited published information on the effects of balanced solutions on outcome, we cannot currently recommend changing fluid therapy to the use of a balanced colloid preparation.
Permalink
05 Jan 12
Posted in Fluid management at 21:58 by Laci
By S Kozek-Langenecker
Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 2009;23:225-236
Haemostatic alterations associated with the use of fluids are related to non-specific dilutional effects and colloid-specific effects, such as acquired von Willebrand syndrome, inhibition of platelet function and fibrin polymerization. Judging by currently available evidence, dextran, hetastarch and pentastarch have a more pronounced impact than tetrastarch, gelatin and albumin. In patients with hypocoagulability, tetrastarch appears to be a suitable volume expander due to its high safety index and volume efficacy. Gelatins have lower inhibitory effects on clot strength compared with tetrastarch, but their volume efficacy is also lower. Dextrans are potent anticoagulants with a high risk for adverse reactions. Albumin has negligible effects on haemostasis, but low volume efficacy and costs limit the use of a blood product as a routine volume replacement fluid. To avoid potential acidosis-induced changes in haemostasis, plasma-adapted carrier solutions may be used instead of saline-based solutions.Haemostatic alterations associated with the use of fluids are related to non-specific dilutional effects and colloid-specific effects, such as acquired von Willebrand syndrome, inhibition of platelet function and fibrin polymerization. Judging by currently available evidence, dextran, hetastarch and pentastarch have a more pronounced impact than tetrastarch, gelatin and albumin. In patients with hypocoagulability, tetrastarch appears to be a suitable volume expander due to its high safety index and volume efficacy. Gelatins have lower inhibitory effects on clot strength compared with tetrastarch, but their volume efficacy is also lower. Dextrans are potent anticoagulants with a high risk for adverse reactions. Albumin has negligible effects on haemostasis, but low volume efficacy and costs limit the use of a blood product as a routine volume replacement fluid. To avoid potential acidosis-induced changes in haemostasis, plasma-adapted carrier solutions may be used instead of saline-based solutions.
Permalink
02 Nov 11
Posted in Fluid management, Inotropic support, Monitoring at 0:40 by Laci
By L Meng, N Phuong Tran, B Alexander, K Laning, G Chen, Z Kain and M Cannesson
Anesth Analg 2011;113: 751-757
Cardiac output (CO) monitoring based on pulse contour analysis (Vigileo-FloTrac) has the potential to be used for goal-directed fluid therapy in the perioperative setting. However, factors such as vasopressor usage may impact Vigileo-FloTrac’s reliability in tracking CO changes. We tested third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac system’s ability to accurately measure the changes in CO induced by vasopressor administration and increased preload in comparison with esophageal Doppler measurements.
Methods
In 33 anesthetized patients, CO was monitored simultaneously by the third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal Doppler. Hemodynamic challenges included phenylephrine (to increase vasomotor tone), ephedrine (to increase myocardial contractility and heart rate), and whole-body tilting (to increase preload). Measurements were performed before and after each intervention.
Results
Overall, 176 pairs of CO measurements were obtained. The difference between paired pulse contour and Doppler measurements of CO was 0.14 ± 2.13 L/min (mean ± SD), and the percentage error (2 SD of the difference divided by the mean CO of the reference method) was 66%. The trending ability of pulse contour versus Doppler was 23% (concordance, the percentage of the total number of data points that are in 1 of the 2 quadrants of agreement) after phenylephrine treatment, 69% (concordance) after ephedrine treatment, and 96% (concordance) after whole-body tilting.
Conclusions
The pulse contour method of measuring CO, as implemented in the third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac device, accurately tracks changes in CO when preload changes. However, the pulse contour method does not accurately track changes in CO induced with phenylephrine and ephedrine.
Permalink
24 Oct 11
Posted in Fluid management at 0:58 by Laci
By S McDonald, R Fernando, K Ashpole, M Columb
Anesth Analg 2001;113:803-810
Minimizing hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery by administration of IV fluids and vasopressors reduces fetal and maternal morbidity. Most studies have concentrated on noninvasive systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurements to evaluate the effect of such regimens. We used a suprasternal Doppler flow technique to measure maternal cardiac output (CO) variables in parturients receiving a phenylephrine infusion combined with the rapid administration of crystalloid or colloid solution at the time of initiation of anesthesia (coload). We hypothesized that a colloid coload compared with a crystalloid coload would produce a larger sustained increase in CO and therefore reduce vasopressor requirements.
Methods
We recruited 60 healthy term women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia for this randomized double-blind study. Baseline heart rate, baseline SBP, and CO variables including stroke volume, corrected flow time, and contractility were recorded in the left lateral tilt position. At the time of spinal injection, subjects were allocated to receive a rapid 1-L coload of either 6% w/v hydroxyethyl starch solution (HES) or Hartmann (crystalloid) solution (HS). A phenylephrine infusion was titrated to maintain maternal baseline SBP. CO was measured at 5-minute intervals for 20 minutes after initiation of spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome, CO, was compared between groups, as were secondary outcomes: phenylephrine dose and maternal hemodynamic and fetal outcome data.
Results
Maternal demographics, surgical times, and fetal outcome data were similar between groups. There were no significant differences between groups in any measured CO variable at any time point. CO was transiently higher than baseline at 5 minutes in the HS group and at 5 and 10 minutes in the HES group (range, 0.13–1.74 L/min); the overall mean difference in CO between crystalloid and colloid over the study period was 0.06 L/min (95% confidence interval: −0.46 to 0.58). Stroke volume was higher than baseline in both groups throughout; peak velocity was consistently higher than baseline only in the HES group; and corrected flow time increased in both groups; the effect was transient in the HS but sustained in the HES group. Heart rate was not different at any time point within or between groups but did decrease over time. The total phenylephrine dose from time of spinal anesthesia to delivery was similar between groups.
Conclusion
We found no difference in CO in women randomized to colloid or crystalloid coload. In addition, there were no differences in vasopressor requirements or hemodynamic stability. We conclude that there is no advantage in using colloid over crystalloid when used in combination with a phenylephrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery.
Permalink